| We, as an accounting
firm, on several occasions have been asked to testify regarding retained earnings as a
factor in child support payments in South Dakota. There
seems to be significant confusion as to what exactly retained earnings is, how it is
calculated, and how retained earnings would be used in child support calculations.
Generally accepted accounting principals define retained earnings as: The undistributed
earnings of an entity. Changes in retained earnings are generally limited to:
- A. Net income or loss;
- B. Distribution of earnings (dividends); and
- C. Adjustments to the opening balance as a result of prior
period adjustments or certain changes in accounting principal.
Please note that Item (C) above is usually defined as an
extraordinary item.
You can see that the retained earnings of a company are
basically the undistributed profits of the corporation. Using the ending balance sheet
amount of retained earnings for current year child support calculations is not correct, as
retained earnings represents the accumulation of many years earnings. Using the change in
retained earnings from the beginning to the end of the year is still not reasonable
because usually the corporation is not in a position to pay out 100% of its earnings and
still finance the continuing business operation.
The concept of dividend paying capacity is a more
reasonable approach to use for calculating child support payments. Dividend paying
capacity is a measurement of the amount of funds available to be paid out as dividends to
corporate shareholders. We have developed a worksheet to calculate the dividend paying
capacity of a corporation.
The purpose of measuring the capacity of a corporation to
pay dividends is that many closely held corporations pay little or no dividends, sometimes
for tax reasons. If you were evaluating a corporation paying all of its profits out as
dividends, this calculation would not be needed. |
Much of the theory
of dividend paying capacity has been developed in litigation by the Internal Revenue
Service in pursuing a penalty tax imposed upon corporations which accumulate earnings,
rather than pay them out to shareholders, with the purpose of avoiding taxes on
shareholders. Our dividend paying capacity worksheet
basically follows court developed concepts taking into account:
- 1. Corporate net income;
- 2. Working capital needs;
- 3. Long-term debt servicing; and
- 4. Necessary fixed asset acquisition.
The concepts adopted by the courts in the Internal Revenue
Service litigations take much, but not all, of the subjectivity out of calculating the
dividend paying capacity of a corporation.
In order to help understand why dividend paying capacity is
more relevant than corporate net income or retained earnings, it is important to point out
that often the value of corporate stock is being used as a property settlement item at the
same time that child support is being considered. The earning capacity or net income is an
important factor in determining the value of a company. It would be inequitable to
determine the value of a company based largely on earnings and then prevent the company
from maintaining that value by forcing 100% of net income to be paid out as dividends.
The courts have recognized this in litigation with the IRS
and have developed the concepts that provide the basics of our dividend paying capacity
worksheet.
If the retained earnings of a closely held corporation is
an issue in a child support case you are involved in, please contact us to discuss these
matters. By consistently using the same concepts and worksheet, it gives the court an
unbiased baseline to use in child support decisions.
--Casey Peterson & Associates, Ltd.
Fall 1997 Newsletter |